Response to the Comments and Suggestions by the Reviewers
نویسنده
چکیده
s in high profile journals often fail to report harm RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS BY THE REVIEWERS Bernal-Delgado E MD PhD MPH1, Fisher ES, MD MPH2 Institute for Health Sciences in Aragon (I+CS)1, Foundation for HealthServices Research1 Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Dartmouth Medical School2 Enrique Bernal-Delgado, MD PhD MPH (Corresponding author) Institute for Health Sciences in Aragon (I+CS) Zaragoza, Aragon, Spain Address: Avda Gómez Laguna 25, 50009 Zaragoza Telephone: +34 976716792 Fax Number: +34 976714670 [email protected]
منابع مشابه
Peer Reviewers’ Comments on Research Articles Submitted by Iranian Researchers
The invisible hands of peer reviewers play a determining role in the eventual fate of submissions to international English-medium journals. This study builds on the assumption that non-native researchers and prospective academic authors may find the whole strive for publication, and more specifically, the tough review process, less threatening if they are aware of journal reviewers’ expectation...
متن کاملارزیابی میزان دقت داوران یکی از مجلات علمی پژوهشی فارسی زبان در تشخیص اصلاحات مورد نیاز یک مقاله علمی ارسالی؛ سال 1389
Background and Objectives: Final corrections on a manuscript sent for publication in a scientific journal are suggested by reviewers. So this qualifies the paper with the least errors for publication. The present study aimed to assess the Persian language peer reviewers' comments on a manuscript sent to an Iranian Scientific Journal (journal of Rafsanjan university of medical sciences), 2010....
متن کاملList of Reviewers of IJRR issues 2015 - ACKNOWLEGMENT
Many scientists and colleagues from abroad and inside Iran (listed below) voluntarily helped us very much in review and evaluation process of manuscripts being accepted for publication in 2015 issues of IJRR (volume 13, numbers 1-4) and those not suitable for publication. Indeed their careful and critically reading the manuscripts and their valuable comments and suggestions greatly improved the...
متن کاملمعیارهای عینی و دهنی داوران در داوری مقالات چاپ و یا رد شده مجله مدیریت سلامت: سال‌های 92-90
Introduction: Peer-review is one of the important pre-publication steps for academic papers. It usually assures the readers about the high-quality reporting of scientific findings. Since objective and subjective criteria used by the reviewers are effective factors on the quality of journal, this study aims to assess these criteria for the accepted and rejected manuscripts of Journal Health Admi...
متن کامل